Social connectedness is the feeling of closeness and
belonging with others and the social world. In Social Connectedness, SocialAppraisal, and Perceived Stress in College Women and Men, Lee, Keough, and
Sexton draw from self-verification theory to demonstrate the relationship
between these three feelings. I will use the Design Thinking paradigm to help
me analyze this piece and to think about how I can initiate change in this
area.
Design Thinking Paradigm: Empathize – Define – Ideate – Prototype – Test
(Hasso Plattner Institute of Design at Stanford d.school). Thanks Jacqueline for introducing this to us!
(Hasso Plattner Institute of Design at Stanford d.school). Thanks Jacqueline for introducing this to us!
..:: Empathize ::..
“the work you do to understand people”
(pg 2)
Lee, Keough, and Sexton begin the article by sharing a
student’s experience of seeing a counselor because she felt socially
disconnected from her peers and her campus. This example is carried throughout
the paper as a reminder of the experience and feelings that this student went
through, potentially encouraging the reader to think about this type of
students’ needs, values, and wellbeing. This makes me think about how I, as a
staff at SFU, observe, engage, and listen to students every day to ensure we
are mindful of their experiences.
..:: Define ::..
identify “…the challenge you are taking on, based on
what you have learned about your user and about the context” (pg 3)
The authors define social connectedness as, “an
enduring and ubiquitous sense of interpersonal closeness with the social world
in toto…” (Lee, Keough, and Sexton, 2002). They provide foundational knowledge
on social connectedness by defining what it is (and what it is not) and
identifying the interpersonal impacts of low social connectedness to a
student’s experience and feelings. They connect it to social appraisal and
perceived stress. Several other papers define this issue in a similar light.
Personally, I can relate to some of the relational feelings the authors
identify when defining this issue – from both a student and a staff
perspective.
..:: Ideate ::..
“…mode
of the design process in which you concentrate on idea generation.” (pg 4)
The authors surveyed 214 college students as a
way to collect data and determine the relationship between social connectedness,
social appraisal, and perceived stress. They found that women with low social
connectedness are more likely to negatively appraise their campus environment
and thereby experience greater stress. They found that men with low social
connectedness are more likely to do so than women. The authors recommended the
need to do more testing and studies in this area. They also recommend that the
student affairs and counseling staff work with students who self-identify as
being socially disconnected and to work on preventative methods to address the
issue. Although I agree with these ideas, the direction of the paper did not
warrant them to go into further details on how to handle this issue.
Here are some of my ideas or thoughts from other sources to address the issue of
social connectedness on campus (easily implemented and “blue sky” ideas):
- identify the factors that contribute to social connectedness and social disconnectedness through a campus wide survey or other method of data collection
- offer grants to student-initiated project ideas that foster social connectedness and student success
- create regulations that encourage faculty to incorporate interactive learning within classrooms
- implement policies that address social connectedness
- create intentional campus spaces that foster social interaction
- design learning spaces (study spaces, libraries, classrooms) that are flexible
- close the gap between students and the deans of each faculty through casual town hall meetings that facilitate conversation
- ensure all staff and faculty know how to identify students who may be experiencing social disconnectedness and ways to address it (or refer to services that can address this)
- initiate a campus-wide campaign that highlights the importance of social connectedness and its relationship to stress, wellness, and student success
- have an event every week during the academic year with the purpose of bringing together the campus community
- ensure all new students attend ‘orientation’ (in whatever shape or form that comes in)
- have cohort-based programs as an option for each faculty/department
- if the student chooses to do so, partner new students up with a mentor
- have practical, community-based project work for every course so that it involves theory/history/content balanced with application
..:: Prototype ::..
“…the iterative generation of
artifacts intended to answer questions that get you closer to your final
solution..” (pg 5)
In this stage, it’s about thinking of ways to
flesh out an idea. Let’s take the idea from the previous stage: “offer grants
to student-initiated project ideas that foster social connectedness and student
success”. We would need to…
-
- come up with the project proposal that includes a funding proposal
- bring together an advisory committee to oversee and judge the student proposals
- determine the funding allocation for different projects
- determine the criteria by which the project selection would be based on
- determine the criteria for how funds will be used in projects (what is feasible? What makes sense?)
- identify ways of measuring success of such a program
- create a marketing and communications plan to promote this to students
- have resources (tangible, staffing needs) available that will help students and their projects be successful
- provide support for students during their progress
Going through these steps of the Design Thinking
paradigm helped me think about social connectedness in a slightly different
way. It is great to be able to use this as a tool to outline the literature
that is available but also add my personal ideas in regards to this matter.
What do you think?




